Welcome to Accounting For Management

Home » Linear Programming Technique » Linear Programming and Maximization of Contribution Margin - Graphical Method



Linear Programming and Maximization of Contribution Margin - Graphical Method:

Learning Objective of the Article:

  1. Define and explain linear programming graphical method.
  2. How profit maximization problem is solved using linear programming graphical method.

The contribution margin is one measure of whether management is making the best use of resources. When the total contribution margin is maximized, management's profit objective should be satisfied.

Example of Linear Programming Graphical Method:

To illustrate the application of linear programming to the problem of maximizing the contribution margin, assume that a small machine shop manufactures two models, standard and deluxe. Each standard model requires two hours of grinding and four hours of polishing; each deluxe module requires five hours of grinding and two hours of polishing. The manufacturer has three grinders and two polishers. Therefore in 40 hours week there are 120 hours of grinding capacity and 80 hours of polishing capacity. There is a contribution margin of $3 on each standard model and $4 on each deluxe model.

To maximize the total contribution margin, the management must decide on:

  • The allocation of the available production capacity to standard and deluxe models.

  • The number of units of each model to produce.

To solve this problem, the symbol "x" is assigned to the number of standard models and "y" is assigned to the number of deluxe models. The contribution margin from making x standard models and y deluxe models is then $3x + $4y. The contribution margin per unit is the sale price per unit less the unit variable cost that is directly traceable to the product. The total contribution margin is the per unit contribution margin multiplied by the number of units.

The restrictions on the machine capacity are expressed in this manner:
To manufacture one standard unit requires two hours of grinding time; so that making x standard models uses 2x hours. Similarly, the production of y deluxe models uses 5y hours of grinding time. With 120 hours of grinding time available, the grinding capacity is written: 2x + 5y ≤ 120 hours of grinding capacity per week. The limitation on the polishing capacity is expressed: 4x + 2y ≤ 80 hours per week.

In summary, the relevant information is:
 

 

Grinding Time

Polishing Time

Contribution Margin

Standard model
Deluxe model
Plant capacity

2 hours
5 hours
120 hours

4 hours
2 hours
80hours

$3
$4

This information is used in illustrating a basic linear programming technique - the graphic method.

When a linear programming problem involves only two variables, a two dimensional graph can be used to determine the optimal solution. In this example, the x-axis represents the number of standard models, and the y axis represents the number of deluxe models. The maximum number of each model that can be produced, given the constraints, is as follows:

Operation

Maximum Number of Models

Standard

Deluxe

Grinding

(120 / 2) = 60

(120 / 5) = 24

Polishing

(80 / 4) = 20

(80 / 2) = 40

The lowest number of each of the two columns measures the impact of the hours limitations. It appears that at best, the company can produce 20 standard models with a contribution margin of $60(20 × $3) or 24 deluxe models at a contribution margin of $96(24 × $4). However, producing a combination of standard and deluxe model may be a better solution.

To determine the combination of production levels in order to maximize the contribution margin, all the constraints are plotted on the graph. In this example, the polishing and grinding constraints are drawn by connecting the points that represent the extremes of production of each model. These points are:

When x = 0:    

  y  24 grinding constraint
  y  40 polishing constraint

When y = 0:    

  x  60 grinding constraint
x  20 polishing constraint

The constraints sketched on the graph define the solution space, as shown below:

[Graph will be available soon]

The solution space represents the area of feasible solutions and is bounded by the lines AB, BC, CD, and AD on the graph. Any combination of standard and deluxe units that falls within the solution space is a feasible solution. However, the best feasible solution, according to mathematical laws, is one of the four corner points. Consequently, all corner point variables must be examined to find the combination which maximizes the contribution margin (CM) of $3x + $4y.

The x and y corner points values can be read from the graph or computed. The x and y values for the corner points B(24) and D(20) are extreme points that were used in plotting the constraints. Corner point C values can be computed as follows:

Write the constraints as equalities:

2x + 5y = 120

4x + 2y = 80

To find the value for y, multiply the first equation by two and subtract the second equation:

4x + 10y = 240

–4x    −2y = 80


 8y = 160

y = 20

Substitute the value of y in the first and solve for x:

2x + 5(20) = 120

2x = 20

x = 10

The value for x and y and the resulting contribution margin values at each of the corner points are:

A

(x = 0, y = 0); $3(0) + $4(0) = $0 CM
B (x = 0, y = 24); $3(0) + $4(24) = $96 CM
C (x = 10, y = 20); $3(10) + $4(20) = $110 CM
D (x = 200, y = 0); $3(20) + $4(0) = $60 CM

The total contribution margin is maximized when 10 standard models and 20 deluxe models are scheduled for production. This solution uses all of the constraint resources:

2(10) + 5(20) = 120 hours grinding constraint
4(10) + 2(20) = 80 hours polishing constraint

Full utilization of all resources will occur, however, only in cases in which the optimal solution is at a point of common intersection of all of the constraint equations in this problem―point C in this example.

 

You may also be interested in other relevant articles:

 

Dear visitor! Do you like this article? If you like, then please bookmark this page and also share with your friends. Thank you for your support.

Bookmark and Share

 Follow us on Twitter

[Report Errors and Omissions]

 

 

 

Back to Home Page | Linear Programming Technique


Bookmark and Share
 


Managerial Accounting Articles
 
Business and Quality Improvement Programs
Cost Terms, Concepts and Classification
Job Order Costing system
Process Costing System
Process Costing System - Addition of Materials and Beginning Inventory
Controlling and Costing Materials
Materials and Inventory Cost Control
By Products and Joint Products Costing
Cost-Volume-Profit-Relationship
Variable Costing System
Activity Based Costing System
Budgeting and Planning
Standard Costing and Variance Analysis
Gross Profit Analysis
Linear Programming Technique
Segment Reporting and Transfer Pricing
Capital Budgeting Decisions
Service Department Costing
Preparing Cash Flow statement
Financial statement Analysis
Pricing Products and Services
Managerial Accounting Terms and Definitions
Managerial / Cost Accounting Formulas

Financial Accounting Articles
Bookkeeping and Bookkeeping Terms
Accounting Principles and Accounting Equation
Journal
Ledger
Accounting For Bills of Exchange
Subdivision of Journal
Final Accounts
Capital and Revenue Items
Single Entry System/Accounting From Incomplete Records
Accounting For Non-Trading Concerns
Accounting for Consignment / Consignment Accounts
Accounting for Joint Ventures

Advertisements

 
 

 
Home | Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer & Terms of Use | Site map | Links | Link to us About Us | Contact Us

No text of this website can be republished without permission of the owner of this site and the authors of these managerial, management, and cost accounting articles. Otherwise sever civil and criminal penalties shall be imposed. All rights reserved.
Copy right © 2009