First In First Out (FIFO) - Materials and Inventory Costing Method:
Learning Objectives:
- Define and explain FIFO method.
- Give an example of FIFO method
- What are advantages and disadvantages of
fist in first out (FIFO) costing method?
-
Definition and Explanation of FIFO Method
-
Advantages of First in First out-FIFO-Costing Method
-
Example of FIFO Method
-
Disadvantages or Limitations of
FIFO Costing Method
The first in first out (FIFO) method of
costing is used to introduce the subject of materials costing. The FIFO
method of costing issued materials follows the principle that materials used
should carry the actual experienced cost of the specific units used. The
methods assumes that materials are issued from the oldest supply in stock
and that the cost of those units when placed in stock is the cost of those
same units when issued. However, FIFO costing may be used even though
physical withdrawal is in a different order.
Advantages claimed for first in first (FIFO)
out costing method
are:
- Materials used are drawn from the cost
record in a logical and systematic manner.
- Movement of materials in a continuous,
orderly, single file manner represents a condition necessary to and
consistent with efficient materials control, particularly for materials
subject to deterioration, decay and quality are style changes.
FIFO method is recommended whenever:
- The size and cost of units are large.
- Materials are easily identified as
belonging to a particular purchased lot.
- Not more than two or three different
receipts of the materials are on a materials card at one time.
This example is based on the following transactions:
February
(1)Beginning balance: 800 units @ $6 per unit.
(4)Received 200 units @ $7 per unit.
(10)Received 200 units @ $8 per unit.
(11)Issued 800 units.
(12)Received 400 units @ $8 per unit.
(20)Issued 500 units.
(25)Returned 100 excess units from the factory to the storeroom to
be recorded at the latest issued price.
(28)Received 600 units @ $9 per unit. |
Calculation for the above
transactions would be as follows:
FIFO Costing Method
February:
01. Beginning balance |
800 units @ $6 |
$4,800 |
|
| 04. Received |
200 units @ $7 |
$1,400 |
|
| 10. Received |
200 units @ $8 |
$1,600 |
$7,800 |
|
11. Issued |
800 units @ $6 |
|
$4,800 |
|
Balance |
200 units @ $7 |
$1,400 |
|
| |
200 units @ $8 |
$1,600 |
$3,000 |
| 12. Received |
400 units @ $8 |
$3,200 |
$6,200 |
|
20. Issued |
200 units @ $7 |
$1,400 |
|
|
300 units @ $8 |
$2,400 |
$3,800 |
|
Balance |
300 units @ $8 |
$2,400 |
|
| 25. Returned to
storeroom |
100 units @ $8 |
$800 |
|
| 28. Received |
600 units @ $9 |
$5,400 |
8,600 |
|
Balance |
400 units @ $8 |
$3,200 |
|
|
600 units @ $9 |
$5,400 |
$8,600 |
FIFO method is definitely awkward if frequent
purchases are made at different prices and if units from several purchases
are on hand at the same time. Added costing difficulties arise when returns
to vendors or to the storeroom occur.
|